At MMA Law, we develop a range of defence strategies tailored to your situation. Below, we outline the key defences we may use to help fight charges of conspiracy to supply Class B drugs.
Lack of Intent
To be convicted of conspiracy, the prosecution must prove that you intended to participate in an agreement to supply drugs. If you were involved in a situation without fully understanding the illegal nature of what was happening, this defence can apply.
For example, if you were unaware that a delivery or package involved drugs, your solicitor can argue that you did not have the intent to conspire. Proving a lack of intent can weaken the prosecution's case significantly.
Duress or Coercion
If you were forced into the conspiracy due to threats, violence, or intimidation, duress is a valid defence. In simple terms, this means you didn’t willingly participate but were pressured into the situation by someone else.
This might involve showing evidence that you were afraid for your safety or the safety of your family. For example, if someone threatened you to transport or store drugs, your solicitor can argue that you acted out of fear, not criminal intent.
Unlawful Search and Seizure
If the police obtained evidence against you through an unlawful search or other procedural violations, that evidence may be inadmissible in court. This could involve illegal searches of your property, phone records, or vehicle.
Our team would examine how the police gathered evidence and if it violated your rights. If the evidence was gathered without proper legal procedures, the court may throw it out, making it harder for the prosecution to prove their case.
Minimal Involvement
Sometimes, individuals are caught up in conspiracy cases despite having a very minor role in the overall operation. If your involvement in the conspiracy was minimal, such as unknowingly offering a ride to someone involved in drug supply, we can argue that your actions did not amount to active participation in a conspiracy. Demonstrating that you played a limited role could result in reduced charges or penalties.
No Agreement to Supply
The essence of a conspiracy charge is the agreement to commit a crime. If there is no clear proof that you agreed to supply class a or b drugs, the prosecution’s case becomes weak. For example, phone records, texts, or conversations may not conclusively prove that you made any agreement to participate. Our solicitors can argue that the evidence does not show a direct agreement to supply drugs, weakening the charge against you.
At MMA Law, we analyse every detail of your case to choose the best defence strategy. Whether it’s challenging the evidence or questioning your role in the conspiracy, we work tirelessly to achieve the best possible outcome for you.