If you have been accused of false accounting or embezzlement, you may be facing a serious financial crime allegation that needs expert legal advice. These cases often move quickly, with employer investigations, police interviews, and potential criminal charges following soon after. At MMA Law, we specialise in defending complex workplace and financial allegations. Our solicitors understand how these cases are built, how evidence can be misinterpreted, and how easily mistakes can be treated as dishonesty. If you need false accounting solicitors who can protect your position and guide you from the very start, our team can help. The earlier you speak to a specialist, the more options you may have. Early legal advice can prevent avoidable errors and help you take control of what happens next.
Get Your Free ConsultationFalse accounting is a criminal offence under Section 17 of the Fraud Act 2006. It occurs when someone provides misleading records, hides financial information, or alters company accounts or documents to benefit themselves or another, or to cause loss to someone else.
Embezzlement means the dishonest misappropriation of funds that a person was trusted to handle. While not named as a separate offence in UK law, embezzlement is usually prosecuted under the Theft Act or as part of a wider fraud or false accounting investigation.
The key difference between a genuine mistake and a criminal act is dishonest intent. The law is clear that honest errors, poor bookkeeping, or confusion about processes are not crimes. The prosecution must prove that someone acted dishonestly, using what is known as the dishonesty test. Many cases begin as misunderstandings or administrative errors, not deliberate wrongdoing.
Allegations of false accounting or embezzlement can have immediate and long-term effects on your working life and reputation. Many people are suspended from their job as soon as an investigation begins, and dismissal is common even before any criminal conviction is reached.
For professionals such as accountants, bookkeepers, and finance workers, there is a real risk of losing professional accreditation or membership of regulatory bodies. This can end a career built over many years. Even if you are cleared, the damage to your reputation can be lasting - colleagues, clients, and employers may have concerns about trust and reliability.
Other consequences may include:
At MMA Law, we understand the emotional and practical impact these cases have. Our solicitors work not only to defend against criminal charges but also to protect your career prospects, reputation, and future opportunities. We can help negotiate with employers, advise on regulatory issues, and support you in managing the wider consequences of an allegation.
You can be accused of false accounting or embezzlement in any environment where you have financial responsibility or access to funds. These allegations are most common in roles that involve:
Suspicions can arise from missing receipts, unusual transactions, audit discrepancies, or concerns raised during a workplace audit. Sometimes even honest mistakes or system errors trigger employer investigations.
It’s important to remember: suspicion does not equal guilt. MMA Law acts for employees, managers, directors, and professionals who have been accused in these situations. Our solicitors are experienced in challenging assumptions and ensuring every case is treated fairly.
Allegations of false accounting and embezzlement frequently arise from scenarios found in many workplaces. Below are some typical examples and the kinds of situations that may lead to investigation:
This could involve adjusting numbers in ledgers or financial statements to hide losses, inflate profits, or cover cash shortages. For instance, a finance manager might be accused of amending figures during the annual audit process to present a better financial picture to directors or stakeholders.
Employees or business owners may be accused of generating false invoices or editing legitimate ones. This could be done to claim payments for goods or services never provided, or to move money within a business without proper authorisation. It often arises during HMRC or internal company audits.
Sales staff or managers might be suspected of altering sales entries in bookkeeping software to increase bonuses, reach targets, or hide till shortages. For example, “voiding” sales after cash is removed or inputting fictitious transactions to balance the books.
Common in both small businesses and large organisations, this occurs when individuals submit claims for expenses that were never incurred, or inflate the amounts. A staff member might submit receipts for personal items as business purchases, or duplicate claims for the same expense.
Payroll or HR staff could be accused of adding extra hours to their own timesheets, paying wages to fictitious “ghost” employees, or making unauthorised payments. These discrepancies often surface during payroll reconciliations or after whistleblowing by colleagues.
Direct theft is still common, especially in roles with cash handling responsibilities such as retail, hospitality, or accounts departments. Allegations may relate to missing takings from tills, unbanked cash, or withdrawals from business accounts.
This involves changing supplier payment details, customer refunds, or direct transfers so that money is redirected to an account controlled by the accused. Such cases often rely on audit trails within banking or accounting software to trace where the funds ended up.
Trustees, finance officers, or employees might be suspected of spending charitable or business funds on unauthorised personal expenses, or for purposes outside the intended use. These cases can arise from whistleblowing, financial reviews, or concerns raised by donors.
Altering or deleting records in digital bookkeeping platforms like Sage, Xero, or QuickBooks is increasingly common. This might involve backdating entries, removing transaction histories, or manipulating automated reports to hide evidence of financial irregularity.
In any false accounting or embezzlement case, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) must meet strict legal tests before a conviction can be secured. There are three main elements that must be proven:
The CPS must show that an entry in the accounts, ledgers, or financial documents was false, misleading, or inaccurate. This could involve altering figures, deleting transactions, or entering information that doesn’t reflect the true position of the business or organisation.
It is not enough for a mistake to have happened. The prosecution must prove dishonesty, assessed using the Ivey v Genting Casinos test. This means the court considers whether an ordinary, honest person would see the actions as dishonest, regardless of what the accused thought.
The act must have been done with intent—either to make a personal gain, cause loss to someone else, or hide information from employers, auditors, or authorities.
Dishonesty is difficult to prove and must meet an objective legal standard. At MMA Law, our solicitors challenge every element of the case, especially intent and dishonesty. We frequently defend clients where errors, misunderstandings, or lack of training—not deliberate fraud—explain any financial discrepancies.
A wide range of evidence is used in these investigations. Common types include:
Financial data can be misinterpreted, especially in busy or understaffed environments.
MMA Law’s expertise includes analysing digital audit trails, metadata, and disclosure issues to uncover mistakes, alternative explanations, or weaknesses in the prosecution’s evidence. Our Middlesbrough law team ensures that every piece of financial analysis is challenged and explained in context.
If you are suspected of false accounting or embezzlement, most cases begin with an internal investigation by your employer. This process can be stressful and confusing, but understanding what to expect can help you protect your position.
Employers often start by suspending the employee on full pay while they investigate. You may be asked to attend HR interviews, provide written statements, or respond to questions about your conduct. Internal audits or reviews of company accounts are common, especially if there are missing receipts, bookkeeping discrepancies, or unexplained transactions. The outcome of a disciplinary hearing could be anything from a warning to dismissal.
It’s important to know that internal investigations and workplace interviews can lead to police involvement if fraud is suspected. Evidence collected during these procedures (including your own statements) can be shared with the police and used as part of a criminal case.
You have the right to legal advice before responding to allegations. Speaking to a solicitor early on means you can navigate HR processes more safely and avoid making statements that could harm your defence later. MMA Law regularly supports clients through every stage of disciplinary and internal audit procedures, ensuring your rights are protected.
When an internal investigation raises serious concerns, employers may refer the case to the police or, in some instances, to HMRC for further investigation. From this point, the criminal process can move quickly.
You may be contacted by the police for a PACE interview (an interview under caution), where anything you say can be used as evidence. The police might also seize documents, computers, and other devices to review accounting records and digital data. After your interview, you could be released under investigation or placed on bail while the case is reviewed.
The evidence is then passed to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), who decide whether to bring charges. If charged, your first hearing will take place at the Magistrates’ Court. More complex or serious cases are transferred to the Crown Court for further preparation, trial, or sentencing.
Throughout each step, legal representation makes a major difference. From the moment of suspicion to the conclusion of court proceedings, MMA Law works to protect your rights, challenge the evidence, and guide you towards the best possible outcome.
A conviction for false accounting or embezzlement can result in a range of penalties, depending on the seriousness of the case and individual circumstances. The Sentencing Council provides guidelines that courts must follow, but outcomes vary widely.
Possible penalties include:
Sentences are influenced by factors such as:
It’s reassuring to know that many first-time offenders, especially where mitigation is strong and losses are limited, can avoid prison. MMA Law works tirelessly to ensure your side is fully heard, and that all mitigating circumstances are presented to achieve the best outcome.
Not every allegation leads to conviction. At MMA Law, we use a range of proven defence strategies to challenge the prosecution’s case and protect your future.
Common defences include:
False accounting under the Fraud Act 2006 is when a person dishonestly provides, creates, or alters accounting records to deceive or cause loss. This is defined in Section 17 of the Act and covers actions like falsifying invoices, deleting transactions, or misrepresenting company accounts.
For a conviction, the prosecution must prove that an accounting entry was false or misleading, that it was made dishonestly (using the Ivey v Genting test), and that there was intent to gain or cause loss. Honest mistakes and poor record-keeping are not enough to meet this threshold.
In the UK, embezzlement is when someone who is trusted to manage funds dishonestly takes or uses that money for themselves. This could mean an employee pocketing company money, a trustee using charity funds for personal reasons, or a payroll officer transferring wages to their own account.Although “embezzlement” is not a specific criminal charge in England and Wales, it is usually prosecuted as theft, fraud, or false accounting under the Fraud Act 2006 or the Theft Act 1968.
Yes, you can go to prison for false accounting if the offence is serious enough. Possible sentences include:
The Sentencing Council guidelines mean that the most severe penalties are reserved for deliberate, repeated, or high-value offences, or where a position of trust was abused. First-time offenders with strong mitigation may avoid prison.
If you are accused of stealing from your employer, the process usually starts with an internal investigation. You may be suspended and asked to attend HR interviews or provide a written statement. If the matter is serious, your employer may involve the police, who could invite you for a voluntary PACE interview or arrest you.It’s essential to get legal advice before answering questions. What you say in a workplace interview can be used against you in a criminal case.
False accounting is a type of fraud, but not all fraud involves false accounting.
The two are closely linked, but each has its own legal definition and evidence requirements.
Accounting mistakes alone do not usually result in criminal charges unless there is evidence of dishonesty or intent to gain. Simple errors, poor training, or confusion over procedures are not crimes.
However, if an audit or investigation uncovers serious financial irregularities, authorities may look for signs of deliberate falsification or concealment. If dishonesty is suspected, a charge under the Fraud Act 2006 or Theft Act 1968 could follow. Legal advice is recommended if you are concerned.
Evidence in false accounting cases often includes:
MMA Law reviews all evidence for errors, misinterpretation, and gaps that may support your defence.
The length of false accounting or embezzlement investigations can vary from a few weeks to many months. Employer investigations are often quicker, but police or HMRC inquiries - especially those involving large sums, multiple years of accounts, or complex audit trails - can take significantly longer.
After evidence is gathered, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) will review the case before deciding whether to bring charges. Early legal advice can sometimes speed up the process or resolve misunderstandings before a case goes further.
If you are facing allegations of false accounting or embezzlement, getting expert legal advice early can make all the difference. The sooner you contact a solicitor, the more options you have to protect your rights and limit the impact on your future.
At MMA Law, our Fraud Solicitors help clients in Middlesbrough, Teesside, and across the UK. We offer a free, confidential 30-minute consultation so you can get clear advice without delay.
Call us today for your free 30 minute legal consultation. We’re here to help you take control and move forward with confidence.
We will assess your eligibility for Legal Aid and if you are not eligible, we will provide you with an agreed fee to represent you to conclusion of your case.
Get Your Free ConsultationMcGee McGee Agar Law Ltd, Amazing from start to finish, really welcoming, very knowledgeable and helped me and my family through a very difficult time. Using all the experience and knowledge they have, they helped me towards the correct verdict and helping me move forward in me life. Me and my f...
Stuart ReevesI would like to take this opportunity to Thank McGee McGee Agar Law namely Matthew Agar and Alex for the support, help and assistance they gave us through a very stressful period in our lives. I cannot recommend them highly enough and again Thank you so much and would have no hesitation in recomm...
Sheryl ButtersWe were supported by McGee McGee Agar Law through a really challenging time, they were not only outstanding at supporting us legally through a really tough time, but we also felt that they were emotionally supportive and invested in our case, and simply put we would have not managed without them....
Thea ZimmermannPaul McGee and the team handled my case very well and had all my charges dropped I can’t thank them enough for the outstanding work. They put my mind at ease thanks Hayley Mitchison
HayleyCan’t thank Cheryl and marriyah enough for everything they’ve done! I am so pleased with the outcome, best solicitors, thankyou for everything
Megan GilleyMcGee McGee agar law supported me through both my divorce and child custody arrangements, through this difficult time they were supportive and thorough with their advice and guidance, I feel that the results obtained in both cases would not have been as positive with any other representation, I woul...
Michael BartliffFinding the courage to sieze an opportunity to leave an abusive marriage, I knew I needed a solicitor I could trust. Having know Matthew for a number of years and working alongside him professionally, there was no one else I would have turned to. Matthew and his team were fantastic. I felt supported...
Carly Devon-BroughI’d firstly like to thank Paul and team for the support during a difficult time. First class professional who knows his job that good. Fully recommend MMA as they are supportive and really know what to do and the win. Wish you all the very best. 100%.
Michael ThompsonI would definatly reccomend. They have all been so helpful, understanding and caring throughout. My divorce is now complete and i am really happy with the service i recieved. Thank you.
Zoe LeechI can whole heartedly endorse Melissa and the rest of the team at McGee McGee Agar Law. The outstanding professionalism in which my case was handled was second to none. The swift and timely updates to any questions or changes throughout the process of my case was extremely appreciated. But most of a...
Anonymous© Copyright 2018 - 2026 McGee McGee Agar Law Ltd
24hr helpline: 020 8054 7227 
